I wish harsher punishments for MAing/botting + some game rule clarifications
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Thats some spicy memes there sir
-
-
-
LOL, very creative.
Changes as always take time. But for now I know the CSR team are doing a good job in their investigations.
Any further change would have to be consider and studied.
For now I can tell you that it will be mentioned and discussed in the team.
Until now we have been more concern with other issues that the community wanted to give attention to, like, as I already mentioned several times, fixing some issues and changing some features to avoid abuses.
After successfully doing that we can start thinking or studying the following steps.
But you have to be patient, blowing things out or proportion, although it is funny (I would be lying if I said I didn't enjoy and had a good laugh with the memes), it is not a fair depiction of the situation.
Yes, there are things to be improved, of course, always, but there is already good work been done and we have to respect that part of the CSR´s work, since, probably, the changes you are requesting are deeper than their roles.
So although I understand the feeling, I do believe we still need to respect the role and the hard work they do in the CSR team.
-
So although I understand the feeling, I do believe we still need to respect the role and the hard work they do in the CSR team.
It is not about respect. This is not how it in economy works. If seller is not able to provide the product, buyer goes away.
All of this "meme-izing" just shows you the enormous scale of frustration of the players. So, in the coming future travian team will observe one of two possible scenarios: a) paying players will step out of the game because it is being damaged thru enormous abuse b) players will start to use bots more often to outbalance the disproportions in the game.
-
-
I have a running ticket about my neighbour on one of the current servers.. Top 10 attacker, usually top 10 raider... has a mini kingdom bordering his/her/they/them villages and mine..
- If we attack him, they get def points.
- One of the accounts has a massive scout army - it scouts something, player raids the target
- We take an oasis from the players kingdom, the other accounts attack first, to minimise players losses (with no chance of getting the oasis for themselves)
- accounts have multiple cheifs, but only 1 village each so it cannot be removed/troops/research lost etc.
- Player has conquered our allies villages - all too close for def.. multis always help clear and reduce loyalty - and never take anything for themselves..
- This week, player is not active? Not in top 10 raiders (we killed a lot of his army).. and his friends go grey...
He has caused multiple players to quit.
BUT... and this is the problem we have... how can I, or the Devs/Admins tell the difference between a player who plays on mobile only, who chooses to support a friend, only has 1 village because they don't want waste time and effort... from the player cheating but doing exactly the same on their mobile phone?
com6 - we had a player who was only there for achievements - 1 village, ,made scouts for everyone.. Maybe they played on their mobile phone. Now not as "supportive" as my neighbours "friends".. but it must be basically impossible to tell the difference between someone legitimately doing this, and someone cheating it.
-
you cant tell the difference and thats why you as a player shouldnt be asked for "evidence" or "proofs". This is exaclty the reason, why you do the data analytics. You let the machine go through monstrous data to find patterns we human cant. It seems to me for quite some time, that there is no such thing on support team. Its like they are trying to outgun the bots and scripts with just looking at the map
-
We will come to bring our love to everybody
--
Best wishes - your Sharley
-
-
What happened to your prestige Sharley?
We with President Putiv V.V. decide to reset it (обнулились короче)
-
Display More
LOL, very creative.
Changes as always take time. But for now I know the CSR team are doing a good job in their investigations.
Any further change would have to be consider and studied.
For now I can tell you that it will be mentioned and discussed in the team.
Until now we have been more concern with other issues that the community wanted to give attention to, like, as I already mentioned several times, fixing some issues and changing some features to avoid abuses.
After successfully doing that we can start thinking or studying the following steps.
But you have to be patient, blowing things out or proportion, although it is funny (I would be lying if I said I didn't enjoy and had a good laugh with the memes), it is not a fair depiction of the situation.
Yes, there are things to be improved, of course, always, but there is already good work been done and we have to respect that part of the CSR´s work, since, probably, the changes you are requesting are deeper than their roles.
So although I understand the feeling, I do believe we still need to respect the role and the hard work they do in the CSR team.
Any updates on this? The problem is still here and we have heard nothing.
-
Troopwipe is also needed to be standard punishment for main account who abuses/uses multi accounts
-
i really have a question?! while you(CSR) have a proof that someone used bot or multie why punish? just delete the account from that server, full wipe, (3 days ban if there was mistake then it will be unban with no penalty) if not then bye bye to that account! and then maybe people stop abusing stuffs as the risk is high!
