bankrupt game - COM3X3

  • Good afternoon everybody,


    I want to talk about COM3X3, it seems like a joke, a game where more than 100 people dedicate 03 months, and many hours of their day, there is the possibility that a child who is the vice-king sitter REMOVE everyone from the kingdom after WW level 50, and there is no possibility to invite all players back again, are the governors clowns for the travian team? Because there is no protection for those who dedicated their TIME, MONEY in this bankrupt game.


    Screenshot by Lightshot


    Screenshot by Lightshot


    Screenshot by Lightshot


    Congratulations to the Travian Kingdoms team, everyone in our kingdom is disheartened, as they believe that support as usual does not have the ability to help, remembering that the possibility of a REMOVING CHILD, and without the possibility of INVITE AGAIN, is a game problem, that harms everyone.



    It's not worth spending money and time on this poorly managed game.


    The travian team is not responsible for the behavior of others, but it is RESPONSIBLE for gaps and errors in the game. And this is definitely a game error.


  • Let me try to phrase this issue from an IT perspective, in few lines of code:
    while ( Leader 1 || Leader 2)
    KicksOut => 1 player === support team do noting
    MassKicksOut => 100 players ============ initiate investigation
    if one of the leaders fall into the category of Mass kick out, the support team must revalidate the session.

  • interesting fact, you can't invite players to your kingdom after 50 lvl WW-----this is the actual problem


    You cannot join/rejoin at last minute--WW lvl 50, fine, but CAN be kick out at last minute.

    Why allow that? Should not be allowed too IMHO.

    If the king decide a governor not worthy the WW, he should kick him before lvl50.

    If a king decide to bring his sweety love, it should be allowed before 50.


    50% of WW effort is already supported, hate or not, the governor and king have to stick to the end because the efforts done.


    So, travian creators, why kicking out still allowed after > 50% WW completed? That is unfair, plus it will break the game for a lot of people if the account compromised, either by player/spy or by system.

  • That's why the game doesn't go forward, because some developer who doesn't know how to think, made an inflexible rule that after WW level 50 you can't be invited, but they didn't think about the human variable, so my friends let me give it to you guys a suggestion: After Level 50 of the WW, you can be invited, only players who were part of the kingdom in the last 72 hours, so you keep the current mechanics and avoid the scenario that occurred, incredible right? It took me 10 minutes to think about it.

  • that is really stupid that a whole round messed up by one guy X(


    это действительно глупо, что целый раунд испорчен одним единственным парнем X(

    And do you see any support helping with the theme, or providing support to these players? That my friends, is the quality of Travian Kingdoms. Nothing new. And if they help, it will still be for future servers, they don't care about the ones playing

  • what will they do now, refreshing the rules at the end of a game?

    sure its hard for all ship members but things are been done now

    You don't need to mess with the mechanics of the game itself, but inviting kingdom members back to the kingdom is not that difficult, but it won't be done, out of laziness, there's nothing that can't be done, just what doesn't want to be done.


    But well, the interesting thing is that this happens on other servers and with other people, so each one feels it in the skin, I didn't do much on that server, but there are people who put a lot of money and played a lot, for this to happen, when it happens to the others there will start to complain :)

  • And the complaint here is related to a problem in the product itself, the player's attitude is regrettable, but he took advantage of a problem in the product, and it is on top of the problem in this product that we are complaining, I want to see if this forum will talk about anything else in the coming months :)


    Bellatora

  • Just like you have to wait for 72hrs for a reinvite to join back into your old kingdom. They can reinvite us by reversing the actions of this one player to the 100 of us that are now out of The Ship kingdom.

    There should be approval of both King and Vice-King to use the Mass exodus tab after level 50 of the WW. This would fix this fiasco that has happened on COM3X3. The coding is not difficult to implement.

  • You don't need to mess with the mechanics of the game itself, but inviting kingdom members back to the kingdom is not that difficult, but it won't be done, out of laziness, there's nothing that can't be done, just what doesn't want to be done.

    The problem is not laziness, but it happen at the end of server. In 72hours probably the season will end. Despite assured winning, now the king and vice have to do it themselves, minus the victory points lost.


    Its much better to have a cooldown period for cases like missclicked, mistakes etc. If not solve then players will start abusing it and will bring mass retaliate/disgruntled on everyone affected making the game have less player.

    Quote

    The Visigoth king and barbarian Alaric was a kingmaker, and he negotiated to install one of his own, Priscus Attalus, as emperor. The Romans refused to accommodate him, and he attacked Rome on August 24, 410 CE.


    An attack on Rome was symbolically serious, which was why Alaric sacked the city, but Rome was no longer politically central, and the sacking wasn't much of a Roman military defeat.

  • what will they do now, refreshing the rules at the end of a game?

    sure its hard for all ship members but things are been done now

    I don't mind we lose this game if things can be improved moving forward. Sitters shouldn't be able to take alliance actions in my opinion. In addition it may be considered that just as you can't add anyone to kingdom at end game you also shouldn't be able to remove someone.