Well, that's why we need to set a cap for these benefits so big kingdoms can't make it too OP
But overall i like the idea as it makes the game more interesting and with more quests to achieve rather than just teaming up to build WW in the late game, we can start teaming up to build other stuff in the early game too.
Posts by RK
-
-
Pretty awesome suggestion! I Completely agree and support this idea!!
You have my like and my comment dude!
-
I dont know what is the hard part of implementing this when they already have the same feature in the report tab. All they need to do is to write the same code for the rally point, no need to create anything new.
Let's hope this time they will consider my suggestion; I can't stand the rally point at its current state -
So I dont really know if someone mentioned this or not!
I have a suggestion that I believe many will supportImagine one of my villages that consistently farms gets reinforced with troops from other players to block an attack and I want to check who sent me troops and when will they land, it becomes nearly impossible to find those reinforcements among the other 900 reinforcements that I'm getting from farming. The same goes for the outbound attacks, it really tests my patience to find the attacks that i sent and skip the raids.
My suggestion:
1) INBOUNDWe need a tab for reinforcement from other players and another tab for reinforcements from my other villages (We should make it like one button for Reinforcements and we we click on it we find other three options to choose from 1. Reinforcements of this specific village 2. Reinforcements of my other villages 3. Reinforcements of other players)
2) OUTBOUND
We need a whole different tab for raiding and another one for attacking (When we press the attacking tab we get another two options to choose from 1. siege attacks 2.normal attack)
EXAMPLE:
Just like when we press on different reports
We get multiple other options that we didnt have before pressing on it
Well thats it for me. Happy new year everyone and please take in consideration what i suggested because it will improve the rally point so much. It is really lackluster right now and terrible.
-
Just like when we select multiple villages and edit troops for them
We need 3 other buttons beside editing troops
We need:
1) option to copy the selected villages2) To move them
3) To delete them
-
And we can do the same in the attacking tab
We should split the raids from attacks and from seiges
Because it is the same problem!
so hard to find the needed attack among 900 attacks! -
And the same can be said about other people reinforcing you and your troops coming back from raiding are all in one tab, it is really hard ti find it in the middle of you 900 reinforcing waves sometimes!!
If they can split this to 2 different tabs would be amazing!
Reinforcments of the troops of this specific villageReinfocments of the troop of your other villages and other players
-
So one day i decided to move around 30 farms from one list and copy them to another two! And it took me so much time because we dont have the mutli-select feature.
Cant we just make that you select the farms that you need to move and move them all at once by one click rather than moving each one at a time.
It will make the farmlist much more easier to work with in my opinion (At least for me)
-
I already answered on all of these like 10 times already, will go for the last one then im out for good from this convo because it seems like people are not understanding me!
I like comments from Wonder players too.
Here is how this server has gone:
1. Wonder formed a massive meta to squash the rest.2. A meta was formed in response. Not a word from Wonder for more than 2 months about this.
The answer
1) It is common sense to go against the number 1 kingdom, im completly fine when other kingdoms helped Vanguard with their attacks on us (If we were not fine you would have seen us complaining when the attacks from all over the server started on us). Metter of fact we were eager to fight against everyone since thats what our goal was. Our goal was to have a game full of war and fun.
Next
3. Wonder complains that this is unfair and is ruining the game.
4. Wonder seeks a partnership with Blade to do the EXACT SAME THING they said is ruining the game.
The answer
2) Our problem started when we clearly have Vanguard leading the way in number 1 spot and we reached Blade to help us against Vanguard just like they helped Vanguard against us (since we expected that this is a 3 way war for the win, where sometimes you fight together and other times against each other) but we got surprised by the their answer when they said "We are sorry they are our allies"!!!
Like dude it became 2 big kingdoms against the third the whole time not just sometimes and that not how the 3 way war is played!!
Meta must stop when you became the largest largest kingdom BECAUSE THE MAIN AIM OF THE FORMED META IS TO DETHRONE THE BIGGEST KINGDOM ON THE MAP (WONDER) AND NOT CONTINUE THE META JUST FOR THE SAKE OF IT. you fullfilled your goal now we are not the biggest and we are actually in third spot now.
The moment the meta continues against the same kingdom even after dethroning them from the number 1 spot it automatically becomes unfair! Again when we were the biggest, it is fair because it is common sence to go against the biggest kingdom THATS WHY WE DIDNT COMPLAIN AT THAT TIME. Now the META should be formed against you!
Im out for good
GG everyone!
-
Gonna state some things that are essential in the game (I expect you know this since you are leaders of big kingdoms)
1) You never go to war with a far kingdom when you have kingdoms to your side that are your enemies
2) It doesnt matter how small or bad the kingdom near you if they are enemies they need to be cleared since they can land an attack on you and you won't have that much time to react
Lets say you are a president, you cant go against other countries when your own territory is not even close to be safe and under control. Like it should be a common sence and very understandable why we went on Loveland and Cesko! (I will still explain it to you)
Im actually baffled that DarthButtHair#EN(1) liked your comment in the first place to be honest!
We had the war with Loveland because they were growing right next to us, we thought that we would shut it down quickly and it wont cost us that many resources nor time. Unfortunately at that time we didnt know that all the other kingdoms were already allying against us (But we did expect this to happen sooner or later) and you actually did great by herassing our armies by defending Loveland. But we still managed to shut them down despite all your effort to defend them.
Then we were planning to do something with both of you (That's after the attack on us, at this time we were a bit still ahead in the lead) and all of a sudden Cesko settles a very importnat spot near our 0/0 Wonder, we asked them to hand us the village or it will be a war and they did choose a war, and again the same thing happens you started to defend them but we still managed to do big damage against them, but they appeared to be a really tough guys and they still didnt give up. By then Vanguard went so out of control (Because they did clear all thier territory, which was one small kingdom if a recall correctly) Basically Vanguard didnt have any threats and they took the whole south part of the map!!. Then as you all know, we contacted Blade to take out Vanguard (Will it be beneficial for Blade to take out Vanguard? HELL TO THE YEAH but we all know why they refused though, they have a NAP LMAO).Some might ask why you didnt attack Vanguard yourselves? Why you asking for help to fight them? here is were the whole problem started, if we attack them they will get defence from (Blade, Cesko, red rocs, the rest of Loveland) why we should attack Vanguard alone when they didnt attack us alone! Why are we doomed to fight the whole server all over again!? Why do we need to always be outnumbered in fights! Why are we still getting kingdoms plotting against us when VANGUARD ARE THE NUMBER ONE NOT US!! why Blade afraid of being the next to take attacks from our side when they are clearly not in the first place and not even close to Vanguard!?!? so many questions and not so much answers! it gives me a feeling that you really think that the state of the server is fair, which really really baffles me to be honest! no matter how you look at this situation it is never gonna be fair at all!
-
I understand your points, but there will always be players they will enjoy simming more. Every kingdom has them. However, I would not agree that full kingdom simming is "rewarding" in a long run. You took the early lead and Vanguard dethroned you through action. The problem is that nobody figths them back. You could, but as your last post implies, you dont care about winning, which is OK, as neither do we. Blade are doing nothing and it seems like they will continue till the end, but they will not win. As for the remaining kingdoms, I dont know anything about them. And we are not going to backstab them. So, you cant complain about Vanguard in that sense, they won through active play.
I remained quiet for a bit but some points need to be cleared here:
1) It is common sense to go against the number 1 kingdom, im completly fine when other kingdoms helped Vanguard with their attacks on us (If we were not fine you would have seen us complaining when the attacks from all over the server started on us). Metter of fact we were eager to fight against everyone since thats what our goal was. Our goal was to have a game full of war and fun.
2) Our problem started when we clearly have Vanguard leading the way in number 1 spot and we reached Blade to help us against Vanguard just like they helped Vanguard against us (since we expected that this is a 3 way war for the win, where sometimes you fight together and other times against each other) but we got surprised by the their answer when they said "We are sorry they are our allies"!!!
Like dude it became 2 big kingdoms against the third the whole time not just sometimes and that not how the 3 way war is played!!
3) Vanguard dethroned us!! you got to be kidding me lol! they did this with the help of other kingdoms!! why you ask us to fight them alone when they will clearly have def from all over the server lmao! Man if they can call def from COM 6 I bet they will!!
4) Louis said find an ally and go against Vanguard?! Please tell me where can i find those mystery kingdoms to call them to fight on our side when the whole server is NAPing with each other?!
5) We are more than able to hurt Vanguard, but I rather help Vanguard win the game and kill Blade than hurt Vanguard real bad and let those cowards called Blade win the game since the only winning side from our war will be Blade!! (This will be so bad for the game if we let Blade win the server without doing anything!!).
Anyway gg everyone, I hope I will never face nor play with Blade ever again! (Might go with a round with you though, cause you really earned our respect
) -
I thought Blade attacked you guys a few times, no?
They did!
But as you said yourself "Few times".When you only use your troops a few times through out the whole server and only because big boys like you (Vanguard and No Grow) were attacking us, thats called passive game style in my book.
They are still third in off power behind both of us and they barely lost any units lol
Anyway their style is bad for the game, they are encouraging this passive style especially if they end up in the 2nd place ahead of us!!
This game is slowly turning to a Sim City because of such kingdoms like them. -
You say Blade is fully passive. No grow and Vanguard were both 60 people, Wonder is 120. Where am I wrong?
Is math hard for you?
> No grow and Vanguard were both 60 people,
60 + 60 + random CSM = 130No grow and Vanguard were both 60 people means both together 60
No grow and Vanguard were each 60 people means both together 120
Math is not hard on me but it seems that English is hard on your buddy
-
Annexed CSM who have no proper hammer, so it is in no relation with your fall.
Do you even believe what you are saying? CSM where 60 players ?!?!?!!?!?
Thats it, wont gonna continue the conversation after that -
Display More
Forgive me, it was some time ago, but when we were first approached about any sort of partnership, it was because there was an existing partnership between Avengers, Fox, and Wonder. We had no interest in such things, and felt Wonder was far from our borders. It makes little difference if they didn't join you if they work with you on every op, defense, etc.
Blade was close, but wasn't attacking us. NoGrow and Fox were our obvious targets, and we had planned accordingly. After the attack on Loveland that was a joint Avenger/Fox/Wonder hit, we re-evaluated. We were less than 24 hours from an op on NoGrow at that time. Like I said before, seemed foolish to attack NoGrow when your alliance was more than twice the size of Vanguard at the time.
It is also important to point out that Design messaged me early on, I believe in the hope of NAP, lol.
The way it is now is interesting. No discussion in this thread while Wonder was way ahead. Now it is different.
It is a common sense to go against the first kingdom in rankings, i dont mind the attacks on us not even the slightest bit becaue we would have done the same if we were in your shoes!
But now since Vanguard is clearly ahead no one is trying to stop them and thats where the fun ends! if you look at it it looks like Vanguard/No Grow+ Blade vs Wonder not a 3-way war. It should be Blade vs Vanguard vs Wonder where we sometimes team up other times fight to get the number one spot!
Like i said attacking us in the beginning is understandable but not attacking Vanguard now is beyond me! It is like Blade had a personal issue with us and they just want Vanguard to win lol XD -
You say Blade is fully passive. No grow and Vanguard were both 60 people, Wonder is 120. Where am I wrong?
Yeah 60 people right ... and how you reached 131 players now? where all those mystery players came from? They came from heaven or the galaxy right next to us XD
-
Saying the one who teamed up with No Grow and Blade to take us down
Baically kingdom 2 + 3 +4 against the number 1
So dont take all the praise for yourself and say thanks to the other kingdoms who helped you achieve it
-
If we really even tried ruining the game we could have let Hellgate, loveland, CSM and FOX join us since day 1 when they asked, now imagine how big we could have been!
But we said NO because we wanted to make this server fair and square! Both of you barely had any wars and nobody even touched you, because you are NAPing with everyone beside us. Like check the attack points and def points of our kingdoms we are miles ahead it showes that we are looking for war not simming city around and NAPing with everyone!
Next server for the sake of this dying game dont be passive, the game is already dying dont kill it more! -
So you want to convince me that 75% of the server against 25% is far more intresting than a 4-way or a 3-way war for the win?!!!
Vitamin was our premades since day 1 and they were barely 10 players, you cant really count them as a kingdom otherwise you should name Viper our other premade before we merge lol!
Reddevil got destroyed! dont know what you are talking about i dont even know these guys.
Anyway the game is almost over and it is too late to start any wars since it is already obvious who is going to winThis game is war and fighting for the win not teaming up against the most active kingdom so you can sim your WW to 100, just saying
Full respect to Hellgate, those guys if they were half as big of us/Vanguard or Blade they would have schooled us all and showed us how this game should be played!
-
Whats you guyz obsession with hellgate anyway
Because they simply aint giving up the 0/0 WW
Like leave it alone and we will leave you alone!
