When 2 World Wonders are the same level, what's the deciding factor for which one outranks the other?
Posts by Zer0kZer0#EN
-
-
Basics never sent Def to Cerberus, and Cerberus never sent Def to Basics. Basics went to war with Darkness because they were the top Kingdom. Cerberus went to war with Darkness because they started zeroing our villages. You created too many enemies and it ended up being the cause of your own demise. Although let's be real for a moment, Basics easily destroyed Darkness. If they wanted they could have multiple WW and win very comfortably, but they wanted endgame to not be boring so they made it look close
-
There is a bug where if 2 WW finish at level 100 then all WW bonus is doubled.
Does anyone know about this? And is this exactly how it works?
-
Eq imperatoris are better early on, but caesaris excel later in the server, when atk per hour is the main factor. When you train troops everywhere 24/7, and you either have enough EI to keep raiding or stopped raiding altogether, EC become more interesting.
Give Tarloc's comment a
because this is the only one you need to read. -
I am but a humble hellhound
-
I would like to place a formal complaint that Basics has destroyed Darkness. Now what am I doing to do with my Def?
-
I can officially say Darkness fears my army
-
At this point I just feel like a dog kicked out of home and left to starve in the streets. I've been playing this game for 2 years now and the amount of progress they've made in that time is something a proper team could do in a week. I really feel like an idiot now that I look back on my Forum Thread when I was new. I thought our voices mattered
-
Count me in
-
WE WANT COMX1! 2 MONTHS IN A ROW OF NO COMX1 IS UNNACCEPTABLE!!!
-
-
So how's the weather?
-
-
Hey all,
Anyone looking for a Kingdom early, PM me. We'll have a fun server together
-
Still waiting for these.
-
This post makes me sad. Stop ruining the cheaper prices for everyone, don't talk about it
-
My group and I are looking to play next in September. We're hoping when the September roster comes out, there will be a COM x1 option
-
But how much gold is sufficient in your eyes? I spend +10K gold on a server for winning 500? Back in 2007-2008 I won a mousepad winning a dutch original server (farming trough tabs and such)
Does an olympian race for the money or the medal?
That'd be for them to decide, but keep in mind when it comes to Gold, we're investing real money, while they have an infinite supply at zero cost. The prize could be 1 billion gold and they still profit. That's the magic of digital goods.
-
-into improving the game.
-
I think Gold rewards are good because it gives people something of true value to compete for. There are plenty of veterans who don't care about Prestige, Achievement or Emblems. Think about competitive Esports, if there was no prize money it wouldn't get the funding it needs to grow into how big it is. The same applies here, where the bigger reward, the greater the competition. Though exclusive Emblems and Prestige would be great motivation for many players too.
I think it should require 1st place in a normal server in order to be applicable to join. If you make top 3 the requirement you could see a lot of normal servers where Kingdoms will team up just so they can finish top 2 or top 3 so they can qualify for Championship, which could make for some boring servers.
And yes I agree Championship servers should be only once every 4-6 months or so. This way they won't heavily impact normal servers.
I think limiting Gold spending is a bad idea because that's relevant to the reasoning of prize funding. Travian Team would benefit from these servers by the massive amounts of Gold that would be spent to win. Some would play for prize money, some would play for the thrill of competition, some would play for glory, some would play for exclusive Emblems. A lot of different reasons for many different people to enjoy it. And the more money this makes, the more money the Travian Team can invest into them, and also into impr
