Posts by Enigma#EN(25)
if a server is named NIGHT TRUCE server, the truce should be at all levels, not just player against player.
It does not make sense that during the truce players are not allowed to attack/raid GREYS, but can attack occupied oasis
What is the meaning of releasing Robbers at night in an "N" server where most of the players are offline?
Unless, the purpose of this is to have players to realize that they could as well play the "24 hours" server, with related revenue increase for Travian. It is no brainer to understand that a 24h has a 25% higher potential in revenue increase.
So, what would be, other benefits, beside a good night sleep? well, I let to you the honor of answering the question; TT (read Travian Team) has for sure weighted the PROS and CONS when they decide to allow the above on "N" servers.
Again, if this was already posted, my apologies.
Could not, Travian Team, seek that the game is a place of harmony and friendship for all of the players? At least in the same Reign/Kingdom?
I've been playing many servers, and many futile issues do creates some uneasy discussion, but nothing compared to the discussion around the Robber Camps rules of engagement.
IGM chats often are of many hours long at every Robbers Camps appearing, filled with words of irritation, powerless, diffidence, a.s.o.
Dear Travian Team, please, add a MAXIMUM number of slots that can be attacked by the single player, and ONLY ALLOW attacks, not raid to this camps.
Perhaps this has already been posted, but I could not find it in any forum.
I was of the idea (naive belief), that a Night Truce server was intended to enjoy a good night sleep for these of Travian's faithful players.
But NO, i was wrong...
In the Night hours the Robbers Camps pops out, forcing many players to wake up in the middle of a dreamed good night sleep.
Why not make Night Truce server really "NIGHT TRUCE" servers, Robbers included?
cancellare il cache (immagini) funziona.
e questo cosa significa?