Posts by Yangus

    what's wrong with it, yes it would be nice if we could use them all. but it's just a free extra item which we can exchange to gold. 100 advpts worth 50 golds. it's still something.

    last year there wasn't any reward for fireworks, everyone were happy. this year some aren't happy cause they get extra items? ?(

    Last year, I used fireworks a couple of times. Seeing absolutely no result from it, I stopped wasting time on it.

    Now there is a point in spending time on it. A lot of valuables coming out of it and that is good.

    And yes, I feel that it is allowed to have an opoinion about the level of success from this change. If there is no opinion, this usually mean that nobody care, not that everyone is happy.

    It would have been very easy to change a counter / flag (depending on the design of this restriction) in such a way that we could have used 2 or 3 per day on this server only. Then also this would have had a purpose.

    What would you say, if you instead of adventures got an amount, e.g. 5-15 gold per truce end but could only use one gold per day. And of course, no transfer to later servers as you have not bought it :/

    I did get 6 adventures the 2nd day and 4 the next day.

    How shall I be able to use them, as I can only activate one per 24 hours.

    Is this considered fully?

    Have I just been lucky to get many adventures and I will likely not get any more?

    My opinion is that they should be possible to use independent of the normal restriction.

    Otherwise, only selling them makes sense.....

    Like the idea of hero mandatory for robber camps.

    Could you please also consider forcing "attack" on robber camps as well, such that we can avoid that camps that are "raided" overflow the next wave with additional troops?

    I really don't see any good reason for delaying this server anymore.

    The server is more or less dead. 719 players "active" for the moment.

    The general problem with normal speed servers is that they take too long time (many days) to finish.

    I have spoken with many players and responded several times in surveys, that you need to shorten this.

    And no, speed servers is not the answer. The level of activity required on a speed server is different.

    We need normal speed servers where:

    • First phase is ok in length. Players build and fight.
    • Mid-game should be shortened by 10-15 days. Too less things really happen in this phase. Many players are quitting.
    • End game, before WW is meaningless long. Reduce with 50%. Even more players are quitting.
    • WW-phase is just boring. Reduce building time of infrastructure with 50%. Those players outside WW teams just see "send more crop". messages

    Too compensate for less time to build hammers, it is possible to decrease building time of troops in general or reduce building time for each phase.

    I think normal speed servers do have a place in the game set-up, but need to reduce the calendar time madness.


    Other than the Card Game getting confused with the European winter time and some rare single stopped events, the Halloween Hunt round ran smoothly.:love:


    This statement Bridget is only beaten by two persons in real life:

    Chemical Ali - Iraqi Minister

    N.N - American President


    Maybe time to recommend your devs to adapt at lest the basic principles of system and SW development.
    Before a new version / revision is launched, it is pretty normal to perform at least a high level regression test.
    - Launch the application (would have got an idea of something wrong already here)
    - Perform one small test of each basic function (upgrade one field, upgrade one building, navigate the map, access the hero, send a raid,..)
    - Perform some more tests on the new functions / changes

    I do not understand that a failure to load on an iphone is impossible to find before a new version is released. This sounds like an extreme "last-minute-fix" which is something you never do without at least a regression test. If this is necessary, then you postpone the release until the test is performed. And there isn't really anything time critical on the app. I am no fan of it, but you were able to play (sim) acceptably with it.

    I have absolutely no problem to understand that bugs come and go with new versions as they often are the result of a combination of events and activities and thus difficult to find by test, but this one is too easy.
    I have been working on complex development for 20 years so I have seen a fair amount of trouble, but you added another dimension by this one.....

    There are a lot of interesting ideas here, which could improve the game for all of us.

    I would like to comment on the criticism of the possibilities for having many treasuries in one village. It makes it easier to defend treasures initially, but actually makes it worse later in the game (which I do like!).
    Coming from com6 and as part of the Phoenix group, we ended up having coordinated attacks from 3 kingdoms on WW and our main treasury villages.
    With the amount of treasures we had in these villages, 30-60k, it actually became necessary to treat them as a WW village. You simply cannot afford to loose one of them.
    We lost the server, mainly because we failed on defending one of the treasuries and lost 50k treasures and a huuuuuge amount of VP as we were rank 1.

    We had 8-15 sieges on WW + 4 treasury villages (not 100% sure about the number) in addition to a huge number of normal attacks on the same + a few other villages.
    If you believe that it is easy to defend 4 villages against this, then you should take a look at the reports posted elsewhere on the forum. We had quite a few 110k defense in all villages in addition to 1-1.5 million in WW, but lost one battle and then the server.

    Even if we lost, I am still a fan of the idea of having many treasuries in one village. It gives attackers more important villages to coordinate on and thus an easier game than just defending WW.

    I also do not see that this favors the big metas more than before. We were big enough, but against well coordinated attacks, we did not manage.
    This is a major improvement of the game and encouraged quite much new thinking on strategy. Well done developers!

    I have been playing travian for 12 years roughly and one thing has not changed: End Game is boooooooring! Too many players quit in mid and end game.

    Speed servers is requiring too much 24/7 activity and I like the pace of normal servers better, but they are too long.

    • I think Tier 1 phase is well defined and works perfectly according to the intention. Building up villages, troops and relationships.

    • I think Tier 2 phase is too long. A lot of strategic decisions and important work to be done, but mostly for leaders. Please consider cutting it down by 2-3 weeks at least.

    • I think Tier 3 (End Game) is meaningless long and totally uninteresting for most players.

    The idea would be to cut down building of all infrastructure in the WW village down to 50% (wall, granary, warehouse, GG, GW). Keep the Wonder building times as they are.
    This will reduce the time when, for all but the WW team, players see more or less nothing happening. Seeing on com2 now that players has been quitting for some time already.

    I would also like to try and include the kingdom members more in the WW part, in addition to the "crop-calls" and "def calls".

    Why don't you develop a counter, visible only for kingdom members, how many minutes left until empty granary in WW. This would give players that never had or seen a WW, some hint about the crop challenge, WITHOUT indicating anything on the def troop count!

    This could be supplemented by some alarm-indication, similar to attack-indication, on the urgency of crop supply.

    I would also like to see more ideas for involving the members that are not in the WW team. I generally do not believe too much in the importance of spies. they have always been there, will always be there, and I do not really care.
    Please let us make the game even more interesting for the majority instead of adapting it to the few negative elements

    I am, as you very tired of the extensive cheating in this game.
    But I think you mix a few things here and a couple of the points, I definitely disagree to.

    @1. Haven't read the posts about it, but even if it is a way to get away from attacks, it is hard to claim this as cheating.

    @2. Sure agreed but it will not have any impact unless the MH are better trained and given better tools to reveal cheaters.

    @3. Again agreed, but it boils down to the tools available. Not everything that looks suspicious from the outside is cheating. Sometimes more activity, better skills or pure luck can be the difference.

    @4. Not understood at all. Do you mean that recruiting many players to a kingdom is cheating? If it is multi, yes, please reveal them. Otherwise, I do not see why this is cheating?

    @5. If it is use of active sitters within the game rules, this has nothing to do with cheating. Here I assume that it is not multi and then, like it or not, this is allowed. It also only has a limited effect in the very early days. Later this is of little or no value.

    @6. Agreed. If players are using bots, then I would like to get rid of them. Some are most likely doing it. I report them and quite often they are banned afterwards. But the game relies on trusting and accepting the decisions of MHs. know several players that claim this is not always correct. I choose to have no opinion. The alternative is to stop playing.

    @7. Agreed, and I believe this is done. If some is using multi, then both (or all) of the accounts are banned. Have seen this on several servers recently

    @8. Disagree completely! To punish a kingdom / king / duke for acts of a single player, is meaningless. As a player, I have no chance to reveal cheaters normally. I know no means for checking if a player has several accounts, is using bots or cheating in other ways. I can sometimes see some suspicious patterns and then I report them, but to expect that I (if I am a royal) should be responsible for other players actions is just meaningless. In an extreme situation, I could join the enemy kingdom, start illegal activities, multi / bot or whatever, and create penalties for the kingdom.
    If this would be the case, I would quit the game immediately. I take responsibility for myself and no NOT cheat. What others do, is their responsibility.

    General, yes this game would be much more interesting if there was less cheating. But please do not turn this into a surveillance nightmare. :thumbdown:

    Screenshot by Lightshot

    Can we get rid of this message now? :cursing:
    It is incredibly annoying ALWAYS having to wait for this message to disappear.
    I have my own account, playing dual on another server and are sitting a couple of players.

    This means that I see this message (and waste the 5 sec) at least 50 to 100 times a day. :sleeping:

    It would have been completely normal to have a check box for "Do not show this message again"
    The lobby is consuming enough CPU / time without such additional wait states.

    If that only were correct....
    For some reason, it often takes hours before a trade (1:1) is set up and until a sitter can accept it.
    I have checked it many times.
    The trade is visible for other players but not when I log into the account I am sitting.
    I understand that you want to prevent illegal pushing, but I am afraid this has gone too far

    I would like to see what we have in Legends since long.
    The ability to mark each incoming raid / attack / siege with a green / orange / red color depending on how dangerous you think this is.
    This makes it easier to see new incomings without all the work in excel or other tools.

    Based on this, an ability to group and hide e.g. the green ones. This would at least reduce the noise introduced by kingdom fake actions

    I do understand that Travian GmbH is eager to get players from all countries. That is generally a good thing as more players means more money to develop the game.
    I also do understand that on the different national domains, it is important to support the official language(s) for each country / region.

    I have given up the national domain for me (.no) as so few players are playing, that it just gets ridiculous. My last RoA server just died because only one alliance did manage to survive and expand. And this was NOT a stupid meta!

    Thus, I prefer to play on international servers (.com)

    But the development of features here is not promising in my opinion.
    The last change log contains, among many corrections, the following:
    "Secret societies: When you want to create a Secret society, you get now an error notice when the name of it already exists. Also, Cyrillic letters are now allowed to use in the name."

    I am currently playing on two servers and it is more and more annoying to see the vast usage of national characters in player names, village names, kingdom names etc.
    I have no problem with Russian players. Have been playing together with several of them many times and still are.
    But the support and use of e.g. cyrillic is making the game more cumbersome and difficult.

    I have no chance to look up the kingdom / player in the stats without going to the map and find the player first or via kingdom and scrolling. Then copy the name.
    I have no chance to set up attacks without doing the same.
    I have no chance to send resources or reinf without doing the same.
    I cannot refer to a player / kingdom in messages without doing the same.
    I cannot write to the player without doing the same.

    The list could be longer but I assume that those that want to, see my point.
    I am not complaining about this for giving the Russians (or Arab, Chech, Scandinavians, Chinese) an advantage. It is the extra time that is the issue.
    I do spend quite a lot of time on this game already and this language support requires me to spend even more time, without achieving anything.

    I remember there was a rule that only the applicable language for a domain was allowed in game interface and that would have meant English or at least English /western) characters on .com
    There is a reason why I do not play on Russian or Chines servers......
    I want to get rid of the support of national characters in the user interface on .com.
    I am raising a question if this should be again the requirement?

    If not, then I am afraid that my 10 years with the game in different variants will soon be over. My first game was the T2.5 a looooong time ago :thumbsup: