Posts by ⭐Starx⭐

Aillas#FR Isn't that already the case ?

Please check Scorox post on data from past servers showing that.

Now that might be a smart move on their part xD

I doubt they want to push people into local worlds after closing so many domains.

Also you can use "@" sign and then type the name of the person you want to tag, and it'll give you options.

Be2-e4 Just wondering if your post is meant for everyone on pro side or it's meant for a single person since you used "you" throughout.

It'd only be right to reciprocate if it was meant for me.

_Best Regards

Sounds like a nice opportunity to leave an "addiction" behind for many people.

Oh yeah of course, you're right, i was just wondering about what the end screen said.

the principles which he could't let go!

So what did the final screen said in that server, usually it is - "XYZ finished the WW"

Be2-e4 wrote:

So yes, one needs a solution. But this solution, which is proposed here, isn't close to a good one. Which is why I'm against it.

Mate you forgot to add "in your opinion" to that statement

Mais les deux versions sont des jeux très différents, par exemple vous ne pouvez pas faire beaucoup de diplomatie et de stratégie dans les versions rapides par rapport aux versions normales.

Yes , it's the same issue since so many years , or rather decades and it's still not fixed. Playing as a dual should be encouraged and awarded as much as owner's avatar.

Well the feature of union did more bad than good in some aspects of the game. Also I doubt that anyone manage more than 50 players anyway, either half of the players manages themselves and other half don't give a damn about things, we all manage the players in between these 2 fractions.

I don't think it's a bug. Also, it's same for all tribes, minimum requirement is smithy and academy for some troops.

Maybe instead of working hard on the idea and implementing it eventually, might be an option to do a voting amongst players who would want to see the idea going forward and who don't want to see such idea being worked upon.

Might save some valuable time of your team who're working on this project.

I don't think you can put enough effort in a 6 week server to care about winning or loosing. But sure great to have some variety to suit everyone.

lol, ask for a refund from Travian
All EU prices should be same.

I really can't envision your point of view. Sorry. I really don't see it making any changes to current unbalanced meta structure.

Je voulais dire que lorsque nous capturerons les champs de céréales de Natars, tous les champs seront au niveau 10. Il s’agit donc d’un bonus que nous n’envisageons pas.

I reckon, both of those can be merged into same achievement since, the latter one will always satisfy the conditions for the former achievement you mentioned.

Also, there are total 22 building slots in a village where a treasury can be built including cards and in the end you need these 3 buildings to construct the last possible treasury :

1 Granary

1 Warehouse - (Edit - Possibly best to have a Stonemason instead since warehouse will be overflowing anyway)

1 Main Building, constructed when the last treasury is in queue by demolishing 2nd Warehouse.

So theoretically you can have 19 level 20 treasuries at max but again, it'll be a village without barracks, residence/ palace and stonemason so not justifiable to have almost 80000 treasures in a treasury with no stonemason and no residence / palace.
Also without barracks/ marketplace, you'll not be able to use that village for collecting tributes or making troops. So make sure it's a 15C so that the wastage of resources is minimum.

Yes, I am all game for that idea. Anyway, it's a different discussion altogether I guess.
newplayer I guess we're going off-topic here, let's stick to the core topic of this thread please.