Several kingdoms (ranked 2,3,4,5,6,etc?) joined forces against The Unit.
Their op was planned nicely and off from many kingdoms arrived nice and well within a few seconds.
We catched most of their significant offs.
Still, it was a good effort, many fakes, an interesting op, several fake sieges. They seem to know what they're doing.
Congrats for your win!
Nobody has anything against russian teams in tk - you have a very good team, and if you are the most dangerous kingdom on the server the others will naturally get together against you.
The idea to limit players in kingdoms is ok - but I think if they made a rule with max 50 players per kingdom you would probably make 6 kingdoms 
First, they need to fix the multi abuse, ban VPN and tor, and reduce all other weird logins and emails.
This is a great idea.
It would be great to have a page of statistics, with information about troops that were created (total, per type), troops killed, lost, attacks sent, received, resources generated, resources farmed, etc.
It would be a real-time-updated page with the visualization of every interesting aspect of the game for each player.
I would see this as a page in the server, not in lobby.
Larry#EN(11) best dual
I believe this is not about an honest mistake, these are conscious attempts to game the system and they should be punished harshly.
Some kingdoms have leaders who do not compromise and do not accept cheating.
Some kingdoms have leaders who share 'how-to-cheat' guides in their kingdom, and ask for passwords.
The rules should make a difference. If, once in a blue moon, the admins get some duke cheating (very rare, unicorn-y rare) that duke should lose all those treasures.
As gov I personally would not join the same leaders again, but I think this is a cultural thing. It is possible that some govs would join them again, and very likely some of those leaders would try to find some other way to engineer the system.
This has been used before to protect treasures/vp. It's a good way to protect treasures and vp in the key moment of the server, like the end day. An off duke can do this after using his army, like on com3 now. Some players know how to exploit TK rules, and others learn and adapt, or leave the game in disgust.
The usual tk response is nothing, they just ignore the situation. This is wrong, the answer should be strong and against this kind of exploit.
It seems TK is a game won almost exclusively by cheating and exploits. Multis, bots, timed bans, api, bugs that show where armies/heroes/catas target/go... it's not worth spending and getting too involved.
What do you think, should this leadership strategy i.e. getting banned to protect treasures/vp result in a punishment for the kingdom, such as treasures/vp loss?
